Monday, May 22, 2017

Make Hydra Great Again

Yesterday marked the opening of the Global Center for Combating Extremist Ideology, with King Salman of Saudi Arabia, President al-Sisi of Egypt, and President Trump in attendance. As far as I can tell, the Center, which is located in Riyadh, is a boiler room for countering jihadism on social media. While combating extremist ideology is pretty much my raison d'etre these days, there’s something creepily Orwellian about governments, some of which are already highly repressive, countering any form of speech.

The three heads of state let themselves be photographed holding on to a glowing orb—I think it's a globe of the earth. The unfortunate visual, combined with the Center's sinister mission, have brought a certain organization of supervillains to the minds of many on them Interwebs:

 

 

Here are some of the more entertaining posts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

McMaster Disaster thinks that it's not a coincidence that a sinkhole opened up in front of Trump's Mar a Lago resort at the same time:

 

 

 

 

For further coverage of the Riyadh Summit, see my posts, Trump Gets One Right and The Muslim Tweet: Daughter of Trump.

Michael Isenberg writes about the Muslim world, medieval and modern. His forthcoming novel, The Thread of Reason, is a murder mystery that takes place in Baghdad in the year 1092 and depicts the battle for the Muslim soul between those who embrace science and tolerance on the one hand, and those who throw in their lot with mysticism and persecution on the other.

Trump Gets One Right

Those of you who follow me on social media know that I’m not a fan of Donald J. Trump, but that I’m always delighted to give credit where credit is due when he gets one right.

Yesterday he got one right.

Mr. Trump’s speech at the Riyadh summit hit the bulls-eye. He called out terrorists for what they are, “barbaric criminals who seek to obliterate human life.” In an uncharacteristically Churchillian flourish, he urged the assembled nations to “Drive. Them. Out. Drive them out of your places of worship. Drive them out of your communities. Drive the out of your holy land, and Drive them out of this earth.” And in a room full of Muslims, he stood up for the rights of women, Jews, and Christians.

My right-of-center friends are kvelling. My left-of-center friends are unusually quiet. What a welcome change from the cringing, apologetic tone of Mr. Obama! Indeed our former president sometimes seemed unwilling to even say the word “terrorism.” In the past day, better commentators than I have contrasted the two men at length, and I don’t think I can add anything to what they have already said. Instead, I’d like to focus on another aspect of the speech.

Mr. Trump mentioned ideology six times. He said that the Middle East can have a prosperous and peaceful future, “but this future can only be achieved through defeating terrorism and the ideology that drives it.” He challenged Muslim nations not only to defeat terrorism, but to “send its wicked ideology into oblivion.” And, “Starving terrorists of their territory, their funding, and the false allure of their craven ideology, will be the basis for defeating them.” (Emphasis mine)

In speaking of ideology, Mr. Trump showed real insight into the War on Terror: it's a War of Ideas. Terrorists become terrorists because they accept an ideology that tells them to become terrorists.

Mr. Trump did not go into the nature of this ideology, but at its core is the Quran, which says of unbelievers, “Kill them wherever you find them and drive them out where they drove you out.” (Chapter 2, verse 191. Yes, I appreciate the irony that Mr. Trump’s speech echoes this verse). Some modern interpreters are quick to argue that the verse refers to the enemies of Islam during Muhammad’s lifetime and does not apply today. Jihadists disagree. They believe that the Quran is the literal and final testament of God, binding on all mankind for all time.

The truth is, most Muslims don’t support terrorism. We see that in the hundreds of thousands of #NotInMyName tweets that follow major terrorist attacks. We see it in the generally positive reception of Mr. Trump's visit within the Muslim world. But large numbers of Muslims do accept the divine origin of every word in the Quran. I don't argue that Muslims should reject the Quran. But I do argue, in step with many Muslim reformers, that they should reject a literalist interpretation of their scripture, as most post-Enlightenment Jews and Christians have done. In accepting a literalist interpretation, they accept the underlying ideology of terrorism, and become its unwitting enablers.

For example...

I watched the speech on Fox News. During the pre-game show they had a Muslim expert on—I didn’t catch her name—who insisted that the Quran is a peaceful document and that the key to defeating terrorism is to return to what the Quran “really” says—the Islam of Muhammad and the Companions. In my humble opinion, she has it exactly backwards. Jihadists understand the Islam of Muhammad and the Companions perfectly well, and that’s the problem. Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy, for instance, says that when he was interrogating suspects in the first World Trade Center bombing, he would ask them about their motivations and they would quote this or that verse of scripture to justify themselves. Mr. McCarthy would go look it up, and sure enough, it said exactly what the jihadists said it said. Indeed, the approach that the Fox News expert proposed, a return to the Islam of the founding generation, has been around since the 18th century and is called Salafism. It gave birth to jihadism.

Of course, in the end, my opinion and Andrew McCarthy’s opinion aren’t what matter. It’s up to Muslims to reform the Muslim religion. As Mr. Trump said in his speech, “Muslim-majority countries must take the lead in combating radicalization.” To that end, after his oration, he joined King Salman of Saudi Arabia and President al-Sisi of Egypt in opening something called the Global Center for Combating Extremist Ideology. It remains to be seen exactly how the Center’s work will play out. As far as I can tell, it’s a boiler room for countering jihadism on social media. Given that the Saudi government is a key player, I am not optimistic that it will work along the lines I suggested, and there’s something creepily Orwellian about the whole thing. The "Hail Hydra" photo making its rounds on the Internet isn't helping. But nevertheless, any recognition that the War on Terror is a War of Ideas is a step in the right direction.

Michael Isenberg writes about the Muslim world, medieval and modern. His forthcoming novel, The Thread of Reason, is a murder mystery that takes place in Baghdad in the year 1092 and depicts the battle for the Muslim soul between those who embrace science and tolerance on the one hand, and those who throw in their lot with mysticism and persecution on the other.

Saturday, May 20, 2017

Mideast Week in Review

  • Trump/Erdogan Meeting
  • US Airstrikes in Syria
  • Iran Presidential Election
  • Trump Saudi Visit
  • Egypt/Sudan Squabble

    by Michael Isenberg

    Trump/Erdogan Meeting: President Trump met with Turkish President Recep Erdogan in the White House on Tuesday. Trump was criticized for the warm welcome he gave Erdogan, despite the Turkish premier’s increasingly authoritarian rule. A letter from a bipartisan group of seventeen senators, including Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Robert Menendez (D-NJ), stated “Erdogan and his allies have mounted an assault on the rule of law, particularly using sweeping state of emergency authorities to stifle fundamental rights including free speech, undermine the independence of the judiciary, and quash any opposition to their undemocratic actions.” They urged the president "to make support for Turkish democracy a priority, both in your meetings with Erdogan this week and in U.S. policy toward Turkey thereafter." But at least as far as his public remarks were concerned, Mr. Trump declined to do so. He said instead that his talks with Mr. Erdogan would focus on trade and the fight against terrorism.

    The visit was marred by violence at the Turkish Embassy between anti-Erdogan protesters and Mr. Erdogan’s security detail. At least one protester was “seriously injured,” prompting Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) to tell MSNBC’s Morning Joe, “We should throw their ambassador the hell out of the United States of America.”

    Read more—

  • Trump welcomes Erdogan amid US-Turkey strains (CNN)
  • Lawmakers demand swift action for Turkish Embassy violence (Washington Post)

     

    Syria: US air forces attacked Syrian government troops on Thursday to prevent them from moving toward rebels allied with the US, along with some US advisers, near the Jordanian border. Although the strike is “believed to be the first targeting Syrian personnel,” a Pentagon official assured the Associated Press, “There is no change in policy.”

    Separately, in Geneva, peace talks resumed. President Assad, who continued to advance militarily with the evacuation of rebel forces from the Qaboun district of Damascus, called the talks “irrelevant.”

    Read more—

  • US air strikes pound pro-Assad forces in Syria (Fox)
  • Syria war: Peace talks restart in Geneva (BBC)
  • Syria war: Rebels evacuated from Damascus stronghold (BBC)

     

    Iran Elections: About 70% of voters turned out to cast their ballots for president on Friday. In what he called a rejection of “extremism and violence,” incumbent Hasan Rouhani easily beat hardliner Ibrahim Raisi, 57% to 39%, with other candidates splitting the remainder. Rouhani’s campaign was marked by extensive use of social media, including an Instagram photo of the candidate with rather unislamically dressed women that appealed to the young and the hip, and trolling of Raisi by Rouhani supporters. Rouhani was considered the moderate in the race. Granted, "moderate" is a relative term. The election was a referendum on his efforts to expand diplomatic and economic ties with the West, which Raisi opposed.

    Read more—

  • Iran election: Hassan Rouhani says voters rejected extremism (BBC)
  • Iran's Instagram election sees rivals battle on social media (BBC)
  • After the presidential elections, will Iran still welcome trade with the West? (BBC)

     

    Trump visit to Saudi Arabia: Mr. Trump arrived in Saudi Arabia on Saturday, the first stop on his first foreign tour as president. Trump has already signed $350B worth of deals with Saudi Arabia, including a $110B arms deal, and is expected to deliver a speech on “hopes for a peaceful vision of Islam.” It remains to be seen how that will be received by the Saudi people, but there’s no doubt Ivanka is a hit. #Bint_Trump (Trump's daughter) is trending big as legions of Saudi men fall in love with the First Daughter.

    Read more—

  • Trump in Saudi Arabia: First foreign trip starts as home troubles mount (BBC)
  • The Muslim Tweet: Daughter of Trump (Mike Isenberg)

     

    Egypt/Sudan Tiff: In a March visit to Sudan, Sheikha Moza of Qatar referred to the country as “the mother of the world.” This led to a squabble between Sudan and Egypt, which claims that title for itself. Soon Angelina Jolie and the British ambassador became involved. An Egyptian talk show host ridiculed Sudan’s pyramids, claiming they look like cheese triangles.

    Read more—

  • The Qatari princess, Angelina Jolie and the battle of the pyramids (BBC)

     

    Michael Isenberg writes about the Muslim world, medieval and modern, exposing Islamists and supporting reformers. His forthcoming novel, The Thread of Reason, is a murder mystery that takes place in Baghdad in the year 1092 and depicts the battle for the Muslim soul between those who embraced science and tolerance, and those who threw in their lot with mysticism and persecution instead.

    Photo credits: CNN, Instagram

  • The Muslim Tweet: Daughter of Trump

    Donald Trump has arrived in Saudi Arabia, the first stop on his first foreign tour as president, and Twitter is atweet. But as @r_2iiiii has observed, with lots of thumbs down and tears,

    Indeed, Ivanka has taken the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia by storm, and #Bint_Trump (Trump’s daughter) is trending big. Number One hashtag in the world for a while. Some of those tweeting are merely in love:

    A second group is making fun of the first group:

    I confess I had some trouble with the translation on this next one. Something about traveling fifty cubits into your valley. It might be obscene.

    Others speculate about what the president is saying to his daughter:

    Whenever something fun is going on, there are always those who disapprove. Some of these are predictably apocalyptic:

    Others are concerned that it plays into the hands of those who promulgate negative stereotypes about Arab men:

    Finally, we seem to have the Middle Eastern equivalent of Batman slapping Robin:

    Of course, Arabs are tweeting about aspects of Trump's visit other than Ivanka. The BBC collected some of the tweets in an article titled 'Trump, servant of God': How Saudis are viewing his visit.

    Michael Isenberg writes about the Muslim world, medieval and modern. His forthcoming novel, The Thread of Reason, is a murder mystery that takes place in Baghdad in the year 1092 and depicts the battle for the Muslim soul between those who embrace science and tolerance on the one hand, and those who throw in their lot with mysticism and persecution on the other.

    Monday, April 24, 2017

    Ambassador Morgenthau and the Armenian Genocide

    A horrible story, but it's important that we remember it.

    As the top American official in Turkey during the early years of World War I, Henry Morgenthau, Sr. received hourly reports from all over the country of the Armenian Genocide. In this video, I read Morgenthau's account of the tragedy from his 1918 book, Ambassador Morgenthau's Story.

    Warning: contains graphic descriptions and images of torture and genocide.

    Michael Isenberg writes about the Muslim world, medieval and modern, exposing Islamists and supporting reformers. His forthcoming novel, The Thread of Reason, is a murder mystery that takes place in Baghdad in the year 1092 and depicts the battle for the Muslim soul between those who embraced science and tolerance, and those who threw in their lot with mysticism and persecution instead.

    Saturday, July 16, 2016

    The Real Problem with Erdogan

    Last night saw a coup attempt in Turkey. Seeking to overthrow the government of President Recip Erdogan, a military faction positioned tanks around the Istanbul airport, closed bridges, buzzed Ankara in airplanes, and attempted to take over TV stations. It was quickly quashed. As of now, nearly 3,000 soldiers are under arrest following fighting that killed some 200 people. Prime Minister Yildirim says the situation is “completely under control.” President Erdogan promises that the insurgents “will pay a heavy price.”

    Not a lot is known yet about the insurgents. Conventional wisdom has it that their cause is one of secularism against Islamism. An analysis by the BBC's Middle East Editor, Jeremy Bowen, is typical. In a sidebar titled "Why did coup happen?," Mr. Bowen writes that Erdogan “is a political Islamist who has rejected modern Turkey's secular heritage.” It’s a heritage that Turkey—and the Turkish military—take extremely seriously, dating back to the 1920s and Kemal Ataturk, the founder of the Turkish Republic.

    It’s true that Erdogan has Islamist roots. He came up through the ranks in the Welfare Party, which was banned by Turkey’s Constitutional Court in 1998 for its opposition to the nation’s secular charter. The following year, Erdogan was jailed for reciting an Islamist poem.

    In spite of his early history, Erdogan has not been that much of an Islamist since he's been in power. The controversies that have characterized his eleven years as prime minister and two years as president have little to do with religion.

    No, the real problem with Erdogan is not Islamism, but rather, in the words of Mr. Bowen, “Mr. Erdogan has become increasingly authoritarian and is trying to turn himself into a strong executive president.”

    Examples abound of attacks on freedom of the press and separation of powers:

  • According to one report, over 1,800 journalists have lost their jobs under the AKP government.
  • In 2014, Twitter and YouTube were blocked in Turkey for two months.
  • This year, thirty “Academics for Peace,” who had signed a petition critical of military operations against the Kurds, were briefly jailed.
  • Traditionally, the President of Turkey is a figurehead, expected to be neutral in political matters. However, Erdogan has been actively involved in Parliamentary elections.
  • Most serious of all, there have been purges of the judiciary and subsequent packing of the bench with AKP supporters. The failure of the coup has given Erdogan an excuse to crack down on the independence of the judiciary even further. The BBC reports that 2,800 judges were fired today in the wake of the coup attempt.

    I would be remiss if I didn't address some counter-examples, so here goes: Erdogan's Justice and Development Party (known by its Turkish initials AKP) has twice been dragged in front of the Constitutional Court in attempts to shut it down for infringing on the separation of mosque and state. But both attempts failed. It's also been alleged that Erdogan provided support to Islamic State; that charge hasn't stuck either. In fact, one of his accusers, US Vice President Joe Biden, ended up having to apologize. If any support did occur, it was probably more about opposing Assad than supporting Islamism. And although there have been restrictions placed on the sale and advertising of alcohol, they aren't that different from what exists in the United States.

    All-in-all, Erdogan more closely resembles a strongman in the mold of Vladimir Putin than an Islamist like Muhammad Morsi. Some of my anti-Islamist friends will no doubt say that he’s playing his cards close to his chest, and he plans to implement a theocracy just as soon as he has consolidated enough power to get away with it. They might be right. But Erdogan’s not really a close-to-his-chest type. He’s more a shoot-from-the-hip, Donald Trump type, with a history of outrageous statements comparing Israelis to Nazis or telling female journalists, “know your place.”

    In any case, regardless of whether there's a master plan for theocracy, I hope, for the sake of the Turkish people, that Mr. Erdogan never becomes powerful enough to implement one. Unfortunately, the failure of last night's coup will make the continuing concentration of power in Mr. Erdogan's hands that much harder to prevent.

    Michael Isenberg writes about the Muslim world, medieval and modern. For his take on the roots of Islamism, see his talk The Islamic in Islamic State on YouTube.

  • Sunday, July 10, 2016

    They don't hate us for our freedom

    Destiny Disrupted: A History of the World through Islamic Eyes by Tamim Ansary
    Book Review by Michael Isenberg

    I wasn't sure what I was getting into when I opened the cover of Destiny Disrupted: A History of the World through Islamic Eyes. I was concerned it might be one of those rants, so common on the Left side of the political aisle, about how, from the Crusades to the invasion of Iraq, all the problems of the Middle East were the West’s fault. So I was pleasantly surprised to find something else instead.

    In Destiny Disrupted, author Tamim Ansary provides the view through Islamic eyes in two senses. The first is geographical. In contrast to most histories of the “world,” which revolve around events in Europe, Destiny Disrupted revolves around events between the Indus and Nile rivers, a region which to Muslims was the world. He doesn’t say much about events in Europe prior to the eleventh century, when contact between Europe and the Muslim world became more common.

    The second sense in which the book peers through Muslim eyes is narrative. If there were a narrative to Western Civilization, it would be something like the story of how freedom and science overcame tyranny and superstition. In contrast, to Muslims, “the underlying force of world history was the quest to perfect and universalize the Muslim community.” The key words here are universalize and community. Muslims believe that it is their destiny to be the world’s one, universal religion. The term jihad, for example, should be interpreted through this lens. It really was, through most of Muslim history, literal warfare against non-Muslims, to push out the borders of the House of Islam. The notion that it is some internal struggle to be a better person came later. And since Islam is a community, threats to its unity must be eradicated. Islamists don’t seek to separate the sexes in order to oppress women. Their concern is that sexual decadence will “disrupt social harmony.”

    Obviously some caveats are in order here. Mr. Ansary can identify some recurring themes in mainstream Muslim thinking, but he cannot possibly speak for all Muslims. Still, it is easy to see that the early years of Islam, during which Muslims won battle after battle, can be understood in terms of this narrative. The subsequent destruction of large parts of the Muslim world by the Mongols, followed by centuries of falling behind the West technologically and militarily are more problematic for Muslim thinkers: hence, Muslim destiny is “disrupted.”

    Understanding the competing narratives is crucial to understanding the motivation of jihadists, which in turn is essential to defeating them. In the wake of the September 11 attacks, it was common in the West to hear, “They hate us for our freedom.” Ansary argues that this fails to grasp the issue, because it fails to grasp the competing narrative. “One side charges, ‘You are decadent,’” he write. “The other side retorts, ‘We are free.’ These are not opposing contentions; they’re non-sequiturs.”

    In describing conflicts between Muslim and non-Muslim peoples, Ansary is fair—mostly. He points out, quite rightly, that the Crusades had little impact on the Muslim world beyond Palestine and Syria. As for more modern conflagrations, the coverage of the Arab-Israeli wars is remarkably even-handed; the coverage of the Lebanese civil war and the fall of Mossadegh not so much. While Ansary is justifiably proud of the accomplishments of Muslim civilization, he does not sugarcoat or hold back when he feels criticism is warranted. For example, many have called the 11th century scholar Abu Hamid Ghazali, who wrote a devastating attack on science, the greatest Muslim after Muhammad. But Ansary doesn’t hesitate to say that he thinks Ghazali was wrong. His “argument against causality undermines the whole scientific enterprise.” Nor does Ansary have sympathy for those Islamists whose solution to Islam’s disrupted destiny is a return to the seventh century. “A trap,” he calls it.

    The style of the book is breezy, with many informal phrases and anachronistic metaphors. For example, he tells us that Abbas, the brutal founder of the Abbasid dynasty, "went by a new title, al-Saffah, which means 'the slaughterer.' Apparently he took some pride in what he had done." The great Nizamiyyah university in Baghdad is described as "the Yale of the medieval Islamic world." You may find this approach jarring, or you may find it readable and enlightening, depending on your taste.

    The one criticism I had was that the footnotes are a bit sketchy. This makes it impossible to further investigate discoveries that I had not encountered elsewhere in my reading about Islamic history.

    There are many such discoveries in Destiny Disrupted to interest someone who already has a good grounding in Islam. Nevertheless, the book is an excellent starting point for anyone who wants to learn the basics, and at the same time, gain some insight into the way Muslims view the history of the world.

    Michael Isenberg writes about the Muslim world, medieval and modern. For his own take on the themes of Muslim history, see his talk The Islamic in Islamic State on YouTube.